Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38

Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38

Imagine a person who always knows what to
say. Who can diffuse a tense situation, deliver tough news gracefully, is confident without being arrogant, brave but not reckless, generous but never extravagant. This is the type of person that everybody
wants to be around, and to be like. Someone who seems to have mastered the art
of being a person. This may sound like an impossible feat, but Aristotle believed that, while rare, these people do exist. And they are what we all should aspire to
be: virtuous. And there’s a whole moral theory based on
this idea of virtue. But unlike most of the moral theories we’ve discussed, virtue theory doesn’t spend a lot of time telling you what to do. There’s no categorical imperative or principle
of utility. Instead, virtue theory is all about character. Rather than saying, “follow these rules so that you can be a good person,” Aristotle and other virtue theorists reasoned that, if we can just focus on being good people, the right actions will follow, effortlessly. Become a good person, and you will do good things.
No rulebook needed. So, why should you be a virtuous person? Because: eudaimonia. [Theme Music] Virtue theory reflects the ancient assumption that humans have a fixed nature – an essence – and that the way we flourish is by adhering to that nature. Aristotle described this in terms of what
he called proper functioning. Everything has a function, and a thing is good to the extent that it fulfills its function, and bad to the extent that it doesn’t. This is easy to see in objects created by
humans. A function of a knife is to cut, so a dull
knife is a bad knife. And a function of a flower is to grow and reproduce, so a flower that doesn’t do that is just bad at being a flower. And the same goes for humans – we’re animals – so all the stuff that would indicate proper functioning for an animal holds true for us as well – we need to grow and be healthy and fertile. But we’re also “the rational animal,” and a social animal, so our function also involves using reason and getting along with our pack. Now you might notice that some of this sounds like parts of natural law theory – Aquinas’ theory that God made us with the tools we need to know what’s Good. Well, Aristotle had a strong influence on Thomas Aquinas, so part of Aristotle’s thoughts on virtue ended up in natural law theory. But for Aristotle, this isn’t about God’s
plan, it’s just about nature. Aristotle argued that nature has built into us the desire to be virtuous, in the same way that acorns are built with the drive to become oak trees. But what exactly does it mean to be virtuous? Aristotle said that having virtue just means doing the right thing, at the right time, in the right way, in the right amount, toward the right people. Which sort of sounds like Aristotle is saying
exactly nothing. I mean, how vague can you be? But according to Aristotle, there’s no need to be specific, because if you’re virtuous, you know what to do. All the time. You know how to handle yourself and how to
get along with others. You have good judgment, you can read a room,
and you know what’s right and when. Aristotle understood virtue as a set of robust character traits that, once developed, will lead to predictably good behavior. You can think of virtue as the midpoint between
two extremes, which Aristotle called vices. Virtue is the just-right amount – the sweet spot between the extreme of excess and the extreme of deficiency. And this sweet spot is known as the Golden
Mean. So let’s take a look at some particular
virtues, starting with courage. What is courage? To take a closer look at this, let’s head
to the Thought Bubble for some Flash Philosophy. Walking home from a movie, you see a person
being mugged. What is the courageous action for you to take? Your impulse might be to say that a courageous person would run over there and stop the mugging, because courage means putting yourself in harm’s way for a good cause, right? Well, no. A virtuous person – in the Aristotelian
sense – would first take stock of the situation. If you size up the mugger and have a good reason to believe that you could safely intervene, then that’s probably the courageous choice. But if you assess the situation and recognize that intervention is likely to mean that both you and the victim will be in danger, the courageous choice is not to intervene, but to call for help instead. According to Aristotle, courage is the midpoint
between the extremes of cowardice and recklessness. Cowardice is a deficiency of courage, while recklessness is an excess of courage – and both are bad. Aristotle said that you definitely can have
too much of a good thing. So, being courageous doesn’t mean rushing
headlong into danger. A courageous person will assess the situation, they’ll know their own abilities, and they’ll take action that is right in the particular situation. Part of having courage, he argued, is being able to recognize when, rather than stepping in, you need to find an authority who can handle a situation that’s too big for you to tackle alone. Basically, courage is finding the right way
to act. And a lot of the time – but not all of the time – that means doing a thing that you know you’re capable of, even if doing it scares the pants off of you. Thanks, Thought Bubble! Aristotle thought all virtue works like this. The right action is always a midpoint between
extremes. So, there’s no all-or-nothing in this theory
– even honesty. In this view, honesty is the perfect midpoint between brutal honesty and failing to say things that need to be said. Like, no one needs to be told that they have
a big zit on their face – they already know. The virtue of honesty means knowing what needs to be put out there, and what you should keep quiet about. And it also means knowing how to deliver hard
truths gracefully. How to break bad news gently, or to offer criticism in a way that’s constructive, rather than soul-crushing. The virtue of generosity works the same way. It avoids the obvious vice of stinginess,
but also doesn’t give too much. It’s not generous to give drugs to an addict, or to buy a round of drinks for everyone in the bar when you need that money for rent. The just right amount of generosity means
giving when you have it, to those who need it. It can mean having the disposition to give just for the heck of it, but it also means realizing when you can’t, or shouldn’t give. So now you can see why Aristotle’s definition of virtue was totally vague – where that Golden Mean is depends on the situation. But, if you have to figure out what virtue is in every situation, how can you possibly ever learn to be virtuous? Aristotle thought there was a lot that you could learn from books, but how to be a good person was not one of them. He said virtue is a skill, a way of living, and that’s something that can really only be learned through experience. Virtue is a kind of knowledge that he called
practical wisdom. You might think of it as kind of like street
smarts. And the thing about street smarts is that
you gotta learn ‘em on the street. But the good news is, you don’t have to
do it alone. Aristotle said your character is developed
through habituation. If you do a virtuous thing over and over again,
eventually it will become part of your character. But the way you know what the right thing to do is in the first place, is by finding someone who already knows, and emulating them. These people who already possess virtue are moral exemplars, and according to this theory, we are built with the ability to recognize them, and the desire to emulate them. So you learn virtue by watching it, and then
doing it. In the beginning, it’ll be hard, and maybe it’ll feel fake, because you’re just copying someone who’s better than you at being a good person. But over time, these actions will become an
ingrained part of your character. And eventually, it becomes that robust trait
that Aristotle was talking about. It’ll just manifest every time you need it. That’s when you know you have virtue, fully
realized. It becomes effortless. OK but: Why?
What’s your motivation? What if you have no desire to be the guy who always says the right thing, or the lady who always finds the courage when it’s needed? Virtue theory says that you should become virtuous because, if you are, then you can attain the pinnacle of humanity. It allows you to achieve what’s known as eudaimonia. This is a cool Greek word that doesn’t have
a simple English translation. You might say it means “a life well lived.” It’s sometimes translated as “human flourishing.” And a life of eudaimonia is a life of striving. It’s a life of pushing yourself to your
limits, and finding success. A eudaimonistic life will be full of the happiness that comes from achieving something really difficult, rather than just having it handed to you. But choosing to live a eudaimonistic life means that you’re never done improving, you’re never to a point where you can just coast. You’re constantly setting new goals, and
working to develop new muscles. Choosing to live life in this way also means
you’ll face disappointments, and failures. Eudaimonia doesn’t mean a life of cupcakes
and rainbows. It means the sweet pleasure of sinking into
bed at the end of an absolutely exhausting day. It’s the satisfaction of knowing you’ve accomplished a lot, and that you’ve pushed yourself to be the very best person you could be. This is morality, for Aristotle. It’s being the best you can personally be, honing your strengths while working on your weaknesses. And, for Aristotle, the kind of person who lives like this, is the kind of person who will do good things. Today we learned about virtue theory. We studied the Golden Mean, and how it exists as a midpoint between vices of excess and deficiency. We talked about moral exemplars, and the life
of eudaimonia that comes with virtuousness. Next time, we’re going to consider a tricky
little problem in ethics known as moral luck. Crash Course Philosophy is produced in association
with PBS Digital Studios. You can head over to their channel to check out a playlist of the latest episodes from shows like: PBS Space Time, BBQ with Franklin, and PBS
OffBook. This episode of Crash Course was filmed in
the Doctor Cheryl C. Kinney Crash Course Studio with the help of all of these awesome people and our equally fantastic graphics team is Thought Cafe.

99 thoughts on “Aristotle & Virtue Theory: Crash Course Philosophy #38

  1. So basically, don't take a stand, just sit on the fence. Explains the world we live in now! Damn all this rational thought.

  2. After much thought l have concluded that Eudaimonia is a state only achievable in the memories of others. A conclution reached only after the totality of a single life can be examined. It's totality can not be known until its ending.
    This is reflected in the stories told about one after their death.
    In the meantime, leave good spirit (happiness) in your wake. That way perhaps you'll also leave good memories to share

  3. Does anyone understand how someone adhering to virtue ethics would approach the topic of abortion? So confused…

  4. Aristotle based his idea of "virtue" on many unquestioned assumptions which he believed universal to everyone. I question that notion.

  5. way to fast. Humans breath…. No need to cut out all pauses. Really hard to listen to this. If a person in front of me would talk like that I would leave the room.

  6. Uh—first typo I think I've ever seen in one of these. At :10 (ish), isn't the word you want "defuse" rather than "diffuse" (although I guess "diffuse" is more picturesque). And oh, come on—Eudaimonia? You just made that one up, right?

  7. Yay! Found it Finally! I'm team virtue. Why do good? Because it's just right you feel it. I mean, when you do something that's wrong, like lying or stealing an avocado. I feel it. I think it's where my soul is, but it hurts. Like I swallowed poison. It doesn't go away until I right the wrong. I can't keep secrets either for that reason. So I'm happy at least one sorta fits. Thank you Mr. Hank, CC, and Aristotle. I love it here, I can just learn and learn, its bliss. My brain is always so hungry..Next lesson! ♡

  8. Aristotle never said virtues can be learnt, he explicitly wrote that virtues can be practiced. During his lifetime, a lot of philosophers believed that only people from Athens can reach true wisdom, while people from other city-states couldn't. In their minds, they believed that a man that wasn't born in Athens didn't have the soul of a philosopher. Also, women were also thought of as lesser by default and as a result, the philosophers believed they couldn't be virtuous. So, in order to practice virtues, you must first have virtues.

    (sorry if broken english, not my first language)

  9. at 3:27 &4:21 the video creators used a sound track of car horns blowing for the city street animation.Little things like that add up to an outstanding video.

  10. Aristotle cuts through all those who came after him…. wOw
    Also this means you can just choose any of the other theories or not…

  11. Thank you so much for making these videos. You're making student's life 100x easier, and it's good for people who's not in school to know something valuable in a very concentrate time. I will keep watching your videos even after I graduate!

  12. Thank you. This helped a lot.

    Have to report about Aristotle and the textbook available for me(the one my prof gave me) is like an encrypted message of something that is nothing and something at the same time. Philosophy is vague but when written in academic language its even more so.

  13. i managed to avoid philosophy courses throughout my undergrad. my masters require medical ethics course with an overvier in philosophy. crash course is a great helo.

  14. I really like your video's. Could you perhaps make one on phenomenology? I'm reading Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception at the moment and I do not understand one single thing that is written in that book…

  15. There are different kinds of ethical virtue theories, not only eudaemonia. Regarding Aristotle, that's what people aspiring toward virtue should strive toward, but in my understanding there are different ways of looking at to be virtuous. One example is striving to respond in the right way toward a virtuous object in question. That could mean responding to a courageous act in the best way possible. Or even responding in a sufficient way that is non-vicious

  16. Such a great lesson. Couldn't understand the virtue theory from my lecture material but now I do thanks to this video.

  17. virtues vary on the place and the times. in Ancient Sparta what was virtueous in Ancient Sparta would be considered criminal in modern America.
    Japan doesn't have Good Samaritan Laws. So interfering with a mugging could end up in a law suit against you. So call the Police if you see a mugging
    in Japan.

  18. Aristotle will lead to Tomas Aquinas then on to Ayn Rand who solves Eudaimonia's problem with the Post Platonic/Kantian altruism that it's up against in the modern world.
    For example Rich men like Bill Gates are only excepted when giving to charity, not when they change the world with computers.
    So altruism is everywhere from modern religion to atheist skeptics. Rand being a modern Aristotelian fixes Eudaimonia's compromise (which altruism easy disrupts and corrupts) with…
    Rational selfishness, which is NOT greed, but living ones own life for yourself, with YOUR ethics.
    So in other words you help yourself and your flourishing will inspire and make good for people around them. Altruism is the complete inversion of this, living for other people but never living ones own life, which sucks for everyone.

  19. Thanks PewDiePie for introducing this concept to a lot of people how were just there for some meme and thanks to Hank as always

  20. From 0:07 > 0:16
    …Sounds like President Donald Trump to me!

  21. I helped teach classic philosophy for 5 years – a help to one of the world's leading scholars in ancient Greek philosophy (Prof. Dylan Futter). And in all those years I never pondered audaimonia, until now – and it's life-changing. Thank you.

  22. Being Virtuous is having the Golden Means of characters, the sweetest spot between two extremes.

    For example, in being courageous, there are two extremes: cowardice and recklessness. We must strive to have a character in the middle of them.
    If you see someone being stolen, before you take action, you must consider the truths: if the robber is weaker than you, you can use brute force; and, if he is stronger, you should call for authority.

    We must have Virtuous Models in life because true virtue is attested in experience. We must emulate people that are Virtuous.

    Eudaimonia is the Pinnacle of humanity. It means human flourishing. We should strive to be Virtuous.

    We can also get virtue in proverbs.

  23. one of my personal mottoes is "fake it till you make it" and whenever I tell someone that it is followed with, "Aristotle said that" and nobody believes me until i explain the nicomachean ethics

  24. The problem with this is of course, that there have historically been huge diversions we can identify as religious dogmas that step in and short-circuit the process of becoming a genuine human being.

  25. Has it ever struck you as strange that some matter-of-fact absolute patent truism mentioned countless centuries ago,
    still, for whatever reason reason cannot be employed or practiced thought or felt or done ?
    Is there anything pitiful going on here ?

  26. Vice is the Horseshoe effect? I thought Virtue and vice was a trait being positive in one context but negative in another, ideals vs extremes. Like Bravery and recklessness, confidence and arrogance, stability and stagnation, etc.

  27. Is it just me or this Virtue Theory works hand in glove with existentialism? That concept of believing that there is no meaning of life so you have to give one to it.

  28. I NEEEEEED SOURCESSS FOR THESE FACTS. I've read about 20 articles and I can't find the information I'm looking for. HELP ME

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *