Climate Change: can nature repair the planet? | The Economist

100 thoughts on “Climate Change: can nature repair the planet? | The Economist

  1. On Friday at 1:00pm GMT we are hosting a live Q&A about the issues surrounding climate change. What do you want to ask our experts? Oliver Morton, a senior editor at The Economist who specialises in climate science and policy, and Sarah Collinson, the director of this film, will be live to answer your questions.

  2. Why is mankind responsible for global warming? Because you cannot tax the Sun!
    CO2 has virtually no effect on warming the planet, it is mostly due to the Suns cycles.
    The amount is just too insignificant. Mankind has only contributed less than 4% of the total CO2 in the atmosphere.
    However if you frighten ignorant people enough they will pay you vast sums of money to make the problem go away.
    I wonder what will happen when people eventually realise they have been taken for a ride??

  3. Trees are liable to burn, especially with the guaranteed climate change already coming our way. Maybe that's mentioned in one of the other links, let me see. Also, it looks like the tropical forests are doomed shortly anyway – which is a bit of a game changer. Pretty good vid though, well done. Liked.

  4. Nice start on reporting, but it would have been helpful to interview a few people engaged in a somewhat more nuanced understanding of trees and forests; looking at watershed repair, biodiversity, forest based economies for instance. Trees provide so much more than structural elements of forests and carbon sequestration. Simplistic simulations which claim forest location can be detrimental similarly fail to consider nuance and the complexity of interacting larger earth systems. For instance an uninformed viewer could come away thinking that cutting down the taiga makes climate sense. Implying that trade-offs between other human uses for (now converted) formerly forested lands are somehow equivalent in value to the need to keep Earth habitable is irresponsible as well as unimaginative. We should be finding ways to meet such needs WHILE increasing forest and tree cover, not instead.

  5. Step 1: Stop pretending we’re somehow not a part of nature.
    Step 2: Get our fucking acts together since we’re destroying our own habitats.

  6. You should have covered the miyawaki method of Afforestation–planting a diverse mix of different species of indigenous trees very densely to accelerate the process of creating a "mature" forest that sequesters carbon very quickly.

    https://youtu.be/10THrUUIwZ0

  7. It's often said that the Earth will flourish after humanity is gone. If, however, the 460 so comercial nuclear power plants worldwide needing regular maintenance (in order not go Fukashima) actually do melt down they will release enough ionizing radiation to destroy the atmosphere leaving the Earth much like Mars. This is a guarantee if our societies collapse due to pandemics famine and wars due to climate change.

  8. "We are under the gross misconception that we are a good species going somewhere important and that at the last minute we will correct our errors and God will smile on us. It is delusion". Farley Mowat

  9. A engineer was hired to plan a platform on which to raise pumping equipment above the level of a recent river flood. He asked my father what is the all-time high? Dad laughed. The highest record level is 45 ft. he replied. The engineer wrote down the fact, but did not understand by Dad laughed.

  10. If planting trees is gonna save the planet, why are vast areas of the Congo being cleared to mine lithium and cobalt for electric vehicles and smart phones?

    Over 5 million dead and millions of plants, trees, animals gone. Ancient tribes of indigenous peoples homeless. This is more of an emergency then the stuff being discussed in this video.

    It will only get worse.

  11. AS THE EARTH WARMS TO THE TIPPING POINT OF NO RETURN TAKING us all INTO RUN AWAY CLIMATE CHANGE THREATENIG THE FUTURE OF ALL LIFE ON EARTH as The Arctic Icecaps Melt Rapidly our world will become too hostile to sustain life ..

    Meanwhile , INDONESIA AND THE AMAZON TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS ( vital for cooling down the planet are being burnt down on purpose) THESE FORESTS ARE BEING DELIBERATELY BURNT DOWN and life on Earth has never existed without them because they produce Oxygen and cool Earth naturally because these Forests are the Planet Earth's Lungs .

    THIS IS ABOUT CORPORATE LAND GRABBING GREED , TO ENABLE THIS 'LAND' TO BE TAKEN FROM THE NATURAL WORLD CAUSING MASS EXTINCTION OF THE WILDLIFE , CAUSING THE MURDER . Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing AND DISPLACEMENT OF THE TRIBES WHO PROTECT THE FORESTS , so that BIG MONEY INTERESTS CAN GROW HUGE PLANTATION CROPS TO FEED us and Farm Animals < ALL TO BOOST SUPERMARKETS PROFITS , supermarkets we seem to want to shop in all the time , with no care what or where products are produced or who or what it affects in other parts of the world ? I do not understand this mentality.

    The last 2 Tropical Rain Forests on Earth are BILLIONS of YEARS OLD and they are now being set alight and burnt down deliberately For Palm Oil , Soya , Sugar , Rubber ( to name but a few) Plantation Crops

    TRADE DEALS WITH USA Corporate BIG MONEY America is also Destroying the Tropical Rain Forests also for , Logging , For Fossil Fuel Mining and precious minerals ; Oil and Fracking , diamonds and gold and many more etc.

    This Land grab happening is the cause of the destruction of the most important vital Tropical Rain Forests on Earth because they Control the WORLD'S ECO SYSTEMS, THEY CONTROL THE SEASONS . Burning down the Tropical Rain Forests is destroying the WHOLE Planet's CLIMATE forever for food production which, is moving exclusively into these parts of the world as OUR fields are EMPTY and Organic Free Range Small Family Farmers are going extinct too as homes and land in the UK is being taken over by wealthy Private buyers and the land is going to HUGE MANAGEMENT COMPANIES being Subsidized to not farm in the UK .Instead of us feeding OURSELVES INSTEAD FROM OUR GARDENS AND FIELDS we are watching the Wilderness on Earth being destroyed because of Government Policy to make tax avoiding Transnational Corporations from abroad get rich from pure terrorism .

    WE ARE LITERALLY EATING OUR WORLD TO DEATH IN ONE GENERATION to BOOST WORLD BANKERS' INVESTMENTS , AND FOR TRADE DEALS exclusively controlled by Cargill LTD the main International Terrorist Agra-business Dictating World Agriculture ( no one has heard about ) and monopolizing the supermarkets to undercut local produce ( Cargill Ltd has taken over from HIGH Street Shops that sold Local Produce because everything we buy in a supermarket is dictated by Cargill Ltd, and mostly comes from anywhere in the world or is produced here using the worst farming processes harmful to our health because of poor animal welfare and poor soils & chemical usage etc.

    The Transnational Capitalists Corporations who profits from destroying our planet and feeding us cheap substandard ethically bankrupt food and produce , the business who profits from the destruction of the planet are total immune from paying TAX to the UK , or anywhere else on Earth so that the PROFITS ARE BIGGER FOR CAPITALIST USA too Boost their US Dollars Their Economy and Stock Market Shares .

    WHAT CAN YOU DO?

    GET OUT OF THE SUPERMARKETS , SUPPORT LOCAL SHOPS AND LOCAL ORGANIC FREE RANGE ORGANIC PRODUCE , STOP USING PLASTIC , GROW SOME OF YOUR OWN FOOD IN YOUR GARDEN, Yard even your window box or ledge DO SOMETHING NOW ..

    SUPPORT LOCAL , GET INVOLVED AND STOP GIVING THIS EVIL DESTRUCTIVE SUPERMARKET CAPITALIST GREED, YOUR MONEY .. BOYCOTT PALM OIL , BOYCOTT FACTORY FARMS AND THINK ABOUT WHAT YOU CONSUME AND WHERE IT COMES From .

    GET INFORMED !! and TAKE ACTION TODAY and EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN , and CHILDREN EDUCATE YOUR PARENTS ! Because we have to live differently because time is running out !!
    Sky turns blood red in Indonesia

    By Christopher Brito September 23, 2019 / 5:20 PM / CBS News tps://www.cbsnews.com/news/sky-turns-red-in-indonesia-jambi/

  12. The real story behind Corporate Trees Planting and Climate Change caused by DEFORESTATION !!
    In other words we can not replace what we are destroying , because Ecosystems can not be created by man , it takes billions of years to create atmosphere and The Earth's Ecosystems, and it takes minutes to destroy

    WE HAVE TO STOP DESTROYING THE TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS NOW and we need to support locally produced , organic , free range small family farms and producers for high street shops .. get out of the supermarkets

  13. Well done. Have enjoyed watching the Economist try new formats over the years, ever since breaking free from 3-colour printing.

  14. Biodiversity will be restored with time due to evolution. If the factor which disturbes natural processes disappears… And that factor is us!

  15. I’m willing to wager the rothchilds run this site just as the own the economist magazine and use it as their propaganda machine. CARBON IS THE BUILDING BLOCK OF LIFE WAKE UP PEOPLE

  16. Do we need to reduce co2 emissions fast and now? The answer is NO !!
    If you want to redistribute health it's OK!
    If you want to reduce pollution of plastic, herbicides,pesticides etc. OK!

    But the manmade co2 is not the problem, it is a propaganda in order to oblige people to change.

    Go see what the real science ( not paid by government subsidies) says about it?

    Freeman Dyson, William Happer, Patrick Moore,Tim Ball, Willi Soon, And thousand of others knows that the climate is run by cycles in nature related to the sun.

    Go see the videos of Tony Heller with the real data ( not the computer simulation ) and if you are just a bit open minded you will see!

    CO2 is a plant food, is the gaz of life itself, it's what you are releasing when you breathe, it's what you're drinking in your favorite sodas!!

  17. it is the growth of humanity that is the real issue, combined by the stock market mentality which based on continued endless growth backed by endless consumerism of junk enhanced by the modern way of life… the continued exploitation of poorer countries, their resources & people maintain the better way of life in the developed world. The world will most likely suffocate in its pollution issue (plastic for one) before anything else…

  18. BEWARE OF GRETA SHE IS POSSESSED.
    CLIMATE CHANGE IS THE BIGGEST HOAX IN THE WORLD WORTH BILLIONS
    President Trump stopped the 3.5 Billion Dollars because they couldn't show where it goes.
    STOP THE GRAVY TRAIN
    Climate Change is :-
    Spring Summer
    Autumn Winter
    Global Warming is due to Sun Spot & Thermal Activity. If CO2 LEVELS drop below 150ppm plant life will DIE. With CO2 LEVELS of 1000 to 2000ppm give optimum plant growth to feed the population. We fill Greenhouses with CO2 to boost plant growth.
    PLEASE DON'T KILL THE PLANET IT CAN LOOK AFTER IT'S SELF.
    Remember the OZONE LAYER SCARE ? We had a hole in the Ozone layer that was going to kill everything !
    WHAT HAPPENED ? ? ?
    NOTHING ! ! !

  19. Douglas Vogt of the Diehold Foundation has proven that galactic cycles run sunspot activity, ice ages and all the little climate changes such as the current one, and all the events are very precisely synchronized. Unfortunately Doug's research shows the next end of the world/Armageddon projection to be precisely Oct 16, 2046. The sun going nova and the polar reversal has nothing to do with climate change but it will "repair the planet" in a natural way with this recurring extinction-level event.

  20. Can Nature save the planet?! Leave it too an economist too come up with such an ignorant, uneducated, unenlightened, question.
    Nature, gives life too life, More trees, less humans.
    The key is to plant trees that were indigenous to given continents around the world. It's not rocket science. Think pre human. Before we arrived, there were estimated to be 6 trillion trees on the planet
    All those trees dealt with all the C02 emitted by every living creature on Earth. From the smallest insects to the largest mammals, and everything in between. As well as decaying plant matter, and methane release.
    Then we come along, start cutting down trees and adding to the C02 output through burning fires, and our own population growth and exhaling C02. Time goes on and more trees get cut down, and our population goes up, and then….the industrial revolution hits. And with it, our population explodes, and vast areas of forests are cut down too accommodate farming. 60 – 70% of which is agricultural farming. So we clear forests, to feed animals in the form of cows, pigs, and chickens, too raise them up to kill them, and eat them! What?! This is the stupidest practice ever, from an ecology standpoint, nevermind the fact we really aren't designed to eat meat, hence all the health issues in the world. Then we start burning fossil fuels for transportation, etc etc etc. So in addition to the Natural output of C02, we now have Industrial, fossil fuels, and human overpopulation 7.5 billion, where it should be 1 billion or less…..And only HALF or less of those original trees that moderated C02 levels. Well gee….it's a wonder why the weather's so erratic, being as trees are the air conditioners of the planet. C02 levels have been steadily going up, instead of balancing out. C02 is a temperature moderator, as it allows a certain amount of heat from the sun to escape, while retaining just the right amount of heat for life too thrive.
    How to reverse this…Do the exact opposite of what we've been doing.
    What people don't seem too understand, is that this planet is, and always was, a self correcting, self sustaining system. That is until we came along and forced our will upon it. Forced being the key word. But, i wouldn't count Mother Nature out yet. One day, unless we get our heads out of our ass's, Planet Earth will press the RESET button, and a mass extinction will ensue. And way before the normal oscillations that have occurred in the past. And for what? Self importance, greed, wants, hunger for power? Or all of them.
    Realization will get is out of this self induced mess we've created by disrespecting the very thing that gives life too life in the first place. Planet Earth. Welcome home. Wipe your shoes before you come in please.

  21. Plants love CO2 and want more. All carbon based life forms seem to flourish in warmer climates… not that humans can actually control the earth's climate… we can't… but just saying… life on this planet prefers warmer climates.

  22. Natural climate change associated with the grand solar minimum mini ice age of the 1600's has returned for its 400 year cycle. Expect radical weather, radical temperatures, meridional jet stream flow, record snowfalls, glacial growth, global cooling, Polar Bear population booms, falling sea levels, blooming deserts, global greening, galactic influences, cosmic rays, wandering magnetic poles, volcanic uptick, earthquakes, mud floods, atmospheric compressions, giant hail stones and associated catastrophes with famine from crop failures leading to "peak food" shock and real climate migration, which has NOTHING to do with the man-made co2 global warming climate change hysteria. See ice age farmer, adapt 2030, John Casey, Tony Heller, Piers Corbyn, grand solar minimum news, ice age now dot com, etc.

  23. Maybe instead of just planting trees, American governments should clamp down on car manufacturers and invest in public infrastructure and solar and wind power

  24. The Economist writing about the state of the environment is like the Nazi party writing about the state of Israel. Sorry to be so cynical, but for the longest time The Economist has aggressively pushed the neoliberal corporate free trade agenda that gutted the middle class, as well as the unsatiable economic growth agenda which has destroyed our planet. This is a decent video, but your news organization has no credibility to speak about these matters at this point. Just go out of business and save the world some carbon emissions please.

  25. Oh my goodness the polar bears are melting, everyone quick hand all your rights, wealth and future over to a select few who promised to save the world if you just comply.

  26. • Economist Magazine is going the way of Time, Newsweek, US News & Report…..so now the new look, propaganda from scared FOSSIL FUEL. OIL has put billions into denial since Reagan.
    •Those that deny are nothing less than brownosers to their billionaire handlers. How does that make you feel? Like STORMY DANIELS, eh, bend over !

  27. People complaining about this. And waiting for governments to do something. Do what we are doing ok our farm we grow our own food. And generate most of our power. Wind solar. And soon water. It's easy. Stop waiting for the government. do it yourselves cliff Taree australia

  28. Well, on the third day, God told the earth to bring forth vegetation and the earth complied with the Creator and has been fulfilling that command ever since. Left alone the earth can repair itself to a certain extent depending upon the conditions of the soil and availability of water and sunlight. Man can assist the earth by planting more trees and other types of vegetation especially in those areas that have been disturbed by development and if done using basic forestry and ecological practices (avoiding monoculture communities), we can begin to sequester vast volumes of CO2 and create equally vast amounts of O2 on the planet. Other strategies for human adaptation to changes in our world need to be pursued since some of the mechanisms involved in the eart'h's changes are far beyond our ability to change or mitigate.

  29. There's a really cool search engine that plants trees, called "Ecosia ". It lets you know how many trees it has planted on the main search engine page. And if you get the app, which is free, it shows you how many trees your searches alone have planted.Tell more people! Here is the link: www.ecosia.org

  30. Out of one hundred species ninety nine are wild animals and one percent are human beings and they are the most dangerous.
    "The Third Pole" is our greatest threat.Water wars are coming.

  31. I'm old enough notice how the weather have changed just in my lifetime, and dramatically changed for the last 30 year. My city, Bangkok, use to be quite cold for months in winter, now not even a sign of cool air. There are severe deforestation around my country and around the world, one of the biggest, thickest and most dangerous jungle in the middle of my country disappear just in my lifetime and only tiny part of it was left as a national park, not to mention all of jungles north to south that are in the same situation.

    It is true that we can't solve this crisis with only planting trees but it is still important to plant them as much as we can , be it by nature or monoculture (at least for a short period until nature heals itself), as they are the only tool we have to take carbon from the air and store it in the ground, no man made machine could do that more efficiently and they also produce oxygen, lower ground temperature etc. It IS part of solutions and I don't think its enough to just let nature take care of itself alone at this time. At least, why not planting some first , local species, let it be mother tree then have nature do the rest? With all that tree planting, we also need to cut down carbon emission, use "less" plastic, use less fossil fuels, recycle our waste, and the list goes on.

    I don't quite understand why many people think it have to be "A SINGLE" solution. They wait, wait and wait for that magical solution and do nothing (even hinder other in many case), for me that's lazy and selfish. At my age, I don't think I will live long enough to see any improvement on this crisis but at least we must "DO" something now not just debating, thinking and researching.

  32. It is frustrating to watch this, as it does not point out the amount of deforestation that has taken place. 'Planting trees' comes later only after reforestation has taken place. So there is a lot of trees to be planted to recover ecosystems that will then again become carbon sinks. So yes, there is need to plant trees and then plant some more and expand those natural forest areas. If you recover the rainforest for instance and all the other forests harmed by human activities, just that recovery planting process can make a massive difference to climate change. "How many trees would have to be planted for this recovery to be achieved?" is a better question to ask.

  33. wrong question!
    there is nothing to "repair"!
    Because there is no "status quo" of the nature, no 100%, no "right" nature!
    Do you think the nature "repaired" itself into being what it is today or creating "humans"?

    Let me put it this way: I AM SICK OF THESE NAIVE IDIOTS TAKING THEMSELVES FOR SOME GODS!!!

    Is it good to protect the environment?
    Yes, but this is something different!

  34. Clean air + water are important, but Climate Crisis is a "FLAT EARTH" Scientology. The Earth has a 26,000 year Calendar in the Milkey Way GALAXY. About 10,000 of those years are an Ice Age Winter, which should begin again at around 3500AD. Mammoths adapt, birds migrate, and YES the Climate Changes.
    The REAL CRISIS is Crime + Corruption in the SINagogue of SATAN Banking Cartel.
    The WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS objectives are to enSLAVE Humanity with Taxes + Climate Regulation FEES for Socialist ZIONISM. Notice that Thunberg is a ZIONIST JEW with a NWO carbon tax for AGENDA 21.
    Enabling ZIONIST JEWS to mismanage the $2.5,QUADRILLION,000,000,000,000 Global DEBT was a Terrible idea, but allowing them to spend the rest of your money is INSANITY!

  35. When Pornhub announced they would plant a tree for every thousand views, did she offer to participate by shagging in their videos?

  36. If you (The Economist) want people to get out of carbon base fuel. First its the West that must make the first move. Walk your talk.

  37. I believe that technology and innovation can solve our problems. This is all just some political agenda to save the "beauty" of nature !

    Oh and for those who say there is no planet B, you are wrong. We have the Moon and Mars to colonize. And for those who say what gives us the right to do so, the answer is simple: rights are social constructs and dont apply on survival.

  38. Re-wilding will help, (science estimates 10 – 25% carbon dioxide)
    but it won't be enough,
    and it won't be soon enough.

    We're in an EMERGENCY N O W :

    change now, or global civilization will destroy our food’s habitats worldwide.

    If we continue fossil-fueled “business-as-usual”,

    then the resulting greenhouse gases will cause a run-away warming of our planet (estimate is 4 to 9 degrees C).

    This would cause extreme weather worldwide

    which would destroy the entire current web of life as we know it.

    On the other hand, if we stop all fossil-fueled industry,

    then the air pollution would clear out of the sky,

    and more sunlight would immediately warm the earth some (science estimates approximately 1 degree C)

    up to a total of approximately 2 degrees C above pre-industrial average temperature.

    This would cause the worst hurricanes, droughts, and floods that we have ever seen in our human history.

    Reality: we’re stuck “between the impossible and the unthinkable.” — David Roberts

    How has this happened?

    Science has measured it:

    if we use the amount “X” of heat to burn fossil fuels,

    that creates pollution that causes 60,000X of that original burn heat in the atmosphere over the course of that pollution’s lifespan as greenhouse gases.

    Two choices:

    1) sacrifice now (and even cause pain)

    or

    2) delete life on Earth.

    There is no Planet B.

    This is not a drill.

    Reinvent, reimagine, rebuild.

    Think of the last 100 years as our "bumpy start" or "growing pains"…

    Let's make it the beginning of our future!

  39. The simple answer is yes (nature can self heal) tho complicated by how we’re gonna get out of Her way. Then further we can steward, which is like mimicking nature or facilitating nature’s recovery. Like mycorrhized planting of natural diversity of trees outward from existing stands, or planting what will take these days. This will expand the hydrological cycle. Then moving agriculture to the periphery of extant stands of forests, planting orchardlike woodlands (like a grove with a canopy letting dappled light thru). Then in desert regions of full sun e.g. California can grow microalgae in photobioreactors. Fastest growing plant known makes oxygen and sequesters carbon quickly as needed to beat tipping points. Ending oil use would be an interesting transition

  40. "Can Nature save the World?" It´s a very ambigous question. The World is Nature, Nature is the World. They´re both the same. We have destroyed it and keep on doing it. We have to respect the place we live in. The society we have invented is not nature-friendly. There are points where Nature CAN´T repair itself: when it´s about SYNTHETIC COMPOUNDS. In the case of Global Warming it would take a loooong time to reset things at the point when we "touched" Nature. There´s a lot of CO2 already release which takes lots of years to be secuestred by photosynthesis. We have deforestated so much that we have to help natural processes to reforest, I believe. We have to go carbon negative as soon as possible. And in the case of pollution by synthetic compounds Nature doesn´t have the "tools" for making them part of the system, so WE WILL HAVE TO HANDLE IT. Plastics, farming chemicals, gases like HCFCs, IT DEPEND ON US. PLEASE PEOPLE OPEN YOUR EYES. STOP AVOIDING YOUR PART OF RESPONSIBILITY ON THIS. STOP BLAMING AT GOVERNMENTS AND FACTORIES. WE, CONSUMERS, ARE BILLIONS. WE ARE ALL GUILTY (specially westernalized citizens). It will worth nothing if governments spend lots of money and emisions on the Energetic transition if we all don´t learn WE HAVE TO CONSUME MUCH LESS ENERGY. It´s not just the Source, which matters a lot, BUT THE QUANTITY. WE CAN´T GO ON LIVING THIS WAY.

  41. What crysis? 500 scientists sent a letter to the UN saying that they dont agree with this climate crysis. I agree with planting trees, but this CO2 climate crysis is ill informed, brainwashed bullshit not backed by science. This is entirely a politicised agenda. Guess what plants breath in? Carbon dioxide maybe? Hystorically the CO2 parts per million dropped to 180 and that was when the earth was in a ice age due to no greenhouse effects and almost all plant life was killed. And also on the other end of the spectrum it got to over 1000 parts per million and plant life florished producing tropical plants as far as alaska, even there was algae in the north pole according to fossil evidense due to the ice caps being melted. https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/06/30/life-on-earth-was-nearly-doomed-by-too-little-co2/ i agree humanity is warming the planet but for the better in regards to giving life the air it needs to grow. This climate alarmists stupidity is just a one sided argument not accepting the bigger picture and channels like this and the media is brainwashing gullable people that dont want to do research.

  42. Repair the planet?? As though some harm was done. Planet will be fine. Ecosystems will adapt and change. Humans are part of this and will have to adapt and change as well.

  43. You can save the WORLD if stop some big companies provide and creat a plastic bags,bottles can etc.. like COCA COLA COMPANY more plastic they thrown in river lakes etc.

  44. Next step for "The Economist" will probably be to sell us some shiny geo-engineering solution that will do what trees can't 🙂
    Make no mistake if nature can't solve this issue by itself, nothing will. Period.
    Not everyone can invest in the next super-green tech. Everyone can plant a tree everywhere.

  45. BEST SOLUTION TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING:- Large Scale Global Afforestation projects

    MOST MAGICAL SOLUTION TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING:- Desert Reclamation

    DUMBEST SOLUTION TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING:- Veganism

  46. Climate change ain't man made and if it is, it's a self solving problem.
    Stop third world development. Stop third world aid. Stop trading technology with our competitors. End welfare. Ban abortion but keep sterilisation and just let the climate kill off those populations not adaptive enough to survive.
    We do this all the time with other lifeforms, why should we pretend that all humans are high IQ geniuses? The majority of human accomplishment has been done by a tiny number of men. The rest of humanity are just here for the ride, and they usually end up shitting up the car and fucking everything up.

    So when the population shrinks, we're fine.

    There, I just saved the world for yall niggas. Yall dont have to thank me at once. (but you should)

  47. Can the Planet be saved? No. When people listen tô a teenager as a líder means there Isn't any adult with brain. The good News. Isn't that bad tô die. With this Planet and humans better to be an animal. So hard tô put down huge insane corruption better tô make a list of the rare still alive normal humans. The rest? Zombies by "nature" or paid ones. Or hired specialists tô chase the normal ones still left. Well, at least make a "how to zombie".

  48. More CO2 will lead to more trees. More warming will lead to more rain and increased tree growth in north-Asia, Scandinavia and Canada, causing a reduction on CO2 levels. This non existing crisis solves itself.

  49. are everyone insane now co² has nothing to do with climate
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZq6zc0G018
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-9UlF8hkhs

  50. Tbh I also h8 climate change.
    But why would you block the road? It’s just plain annoying and that protest wasn’t the best.

  51. BE AWARE – This video is lacking an IMPORTANT nuance: There is nothing in this video about how access to more wood from more trees can cause replacement (substitution) effects. Consumption of enviromentaly friendly wood(based) products (which by themselves has stored carbon) can often replace (substitute) alternative consumption of energy-intensive materials such as concrete and steel in many manufactoring and construction (building) processes.

  52. THERE IS A LACK OF TRUTHFUL SINCERITY WITH REGARDS TO IMPROVNG & PROTECTNG THE ENTITY OF NATURE WITH ITS SURROUNDINGS OF CLIMATE. IT REMAINS RATHER SIMPLE: ALL ELEMENTS THAT DESTROY AND ARE TOXIC BE THEY UNNATURAL SYNTHETIC OR NATURALLY EXTRACTED BUT HARMFUL BEING OUT OF NATURE'S INTENDED EQUILIBRIUM ,MARRING MOTHER EARTH OUGHT TO IMMEDATELY CEASE IN THEIR USAGE.THE MAJOR PLAYERS WOULD BE GASOLINE ENERGY FUEL FOR THE CAR MOTOR TO START ITS TRAJECTORY,COMPUTER SYSTEMS,WIFI,SATELITES THAT UPSET NATURAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS OF THE EARTH, CEASE THE COMPLETE FLOW OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS BELONGING TO LIVE BEINGS,RUIN THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS PERMEATING INTO OUR SKIES' ATMOSPHERES.THE PEOPLE ARE TOO SELFISH TO REALLY DEAL WITH THE ROOT POLLUTERS.WHILE OTHERS HAVE AN EVIL INTEREST TO USE HIGH TECHNOLOGY AS AN INTENDED LATTER FULL SCALE SURVEILLANCE, AND LATTER VIA WIFI TARGETING OF PERSONS THROUGH HIGH MAGNETIC FIELDS FRYING BRAIN LIQUID,MAKING IT LATTER PERMEABLE TO DIRECTLY PASS INTO SKULL CRANE BY SONAR MICROWAVE RADIO HAARP DIFFUSION FOR RECEIVAL OF INTENDED VICTIMS VIA VOICE TO SKULL INVASIVENESS EXTRACTING THOUGHTS, IDEAS,PHRASES, TALENTS&EMITTING BASHING COMMENTARY,EMITTING OTHER COMMENTARY IN THOUGHT MODE TO ALLEGE VICTIM FALSELY THOUGHT OR SAID THIS,THIS SYSTEM ALLOWS FOR FULL MONITORING OR FORCED INFLUENCING OF TARGETING BEINGS MOST STRONGLY WHEN CHIP IMPLANTS WOULD BECOME MANDETORY AND ARE LINKED TO SONAR MICROWAVE RADIO HAARP TECHNOLOGY &WITH ABOVE GROUND SATELITE LINKAGE AND VIA GROUND LINKAGE OF AUDIOBITS,HALLOGRAMS.THIS IS ENORMOUSLY HARMFUL FOR ALL&ALSO HIGH TECHNOLOGY DABBLES IN CLIMATE CONTROLING& ADJUSTING&CREATING OF SIMULATED DISASTERS EXAMPLE HURRICANES,TEMPEST DOWN POURS,EARTHQUAKES, BY MEDIUM USING HAARP STRONG ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS,PARTICLE EMISSIONS ALONG WITH GEOMETRIC PLANE FUEL EMISSIONS OF HEAVY METALS IN GASEOUS STATES MIXED WITH PLANE FUEL(WITH OTHER NOXIOUS ELEMENTS EMPLOYED TOO ETC.,…).THERE IS SUCH TREMENDOUS APATHY AND AN ABYSIS OF REAL SANE INTELLECT BASED ON LOVE OF EARTH, HUMANITY,& OF /FOR OUR CREATOR THAT THESE MEANINGLESS PROTESTS ACT AS HOBBY PASTIMES FOR BORED CITIZENS BASED ON OTHER HONEST ENLIGHTENERS WHO BRING THE TRUTH OF DESTRUCTION TO LIGHT.THE OTHERS JOIN A PROTEST BAND WAGON AS A NOVEL THING TO DO WITH THE IMAGE ASSOCIATION LINKED TO THIS THAT THEY ARE DOING SUPERFLOUS DEEDS OF IMPACT WHICH IS LAMENTAL FARCE BUT THESE SAME MOBILIZED MASSES IGNORE THE MISERY OF CRIME POLLUTIONS DONE TO FELLOW CITIZENS WHO ARE HOMELESS BY VARIOUS DESTROYER ELEMENTS,EVEN BE THEY BY LITERAL EVIL WEALTHY PERSONS DESTROYING VICIOUSLY OTHERS BY JEALOUSY TO POVERTY THROUGH ELEMENTS USING CRIME ESTABLISHED NETWORK TO TARGET SO BY, IN POWERFUL ACCOMPLISHMENTS LIMITED TO THE EXTREMITY OF BRIBING LEFT&RIGHT FOR INTENDED SCHEMES OF DOWNFALL,CONTROLING THE DESTRUCTIVE DOWNFALL BY HIDDING IN OBSCURITY BEHIND&USING CRIME NETWORK TO TOO BADLY IMPOVERISH AND THAT SOMETIMES DOES NOT SUFFICE IN TODAYS TECHNOLOGICAL WORLD OF GREATER KNOWLEDGE BUT THE VICTIM IS RENDERED HOMELESS, DESTROYED TO BE VIALATED MORE FOR GENETIC SCIENCE CRIME TO THAT SICK LEVEL SUCH ONGOINGS HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED WHICH EXTREMELY HARMS THE MODERN MAN WHO BELONGS AS AN ELEMENT OF NATURE.WHY ARE THERE NO PROTESTS AGAINST DESTROYING MAN TO THIS LEVEL AND ALLOWING IT TO BE SO ACCOMPLISHED? FURTHERMORE FROM THE COMMENSEMENT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN INVASION, MANY NATIVE INDIANS REFUSED TO JOIN IN OUR EARLIEST MINIMAL POLLUTING ENVIRONMENT OF NORTH AMERICA FROM ITS EARLIER LAID OUT FOUNDATIONS BECAUSE IT RUTHLESSLY HARMED HUMANS AND NATURE BY EXPLOITATION,POISONINGS,GREED FOR THAT PRIMARY REASON THAT CERTAIN NATIVE INDIANS ABSTAINED FROM INTEGRATION BECAUSE THEIR VALUES COULD NOT ACCEPT BUILDING A POROUS FOUNDATION OF IMMORALITY AGAINST NATURE, MAN AND ANIMALS.THEY WERE CRUELLY HURT, DENIED BASIC HUMAN LIVABLE QUALITY RIGHTS AND THEIR RIGHTS TO LIVE THEIR CULTURE'S NOMADIC LIFE WAS STAUNCHLY OBLITERATED.THEY TRUELY PAID THE HIGHEST PRICE FOR LOVING NATURE WHICH INCLUDES LOVING CARING RESPECTING FELLLOW MAN&ANIMALS AND PROTESTING AGAINST ITS DESTRUCTION. TO THIS DAY NO ONE IS CONCERNED TO RENDER THEM THE HELPFUL INDEPENDENCE TO LIVE THEIR LIVES BASED ON NOMADIC HERITAGE…WHY DO WE NOT REPAIR THE LIVES OF THESE TRUE LOVERS &UPKEEPERS OF NATURE FIRST?.THESE MODERN DAY PROTESTERS ARE UNMOVED BY ALL THIS & ARE UNMOVED BY PAST HISTORY'S EVEN THE MOST VIGRANT EARLY PROTEST OF INVADED VANQUISHED NATIVES AND MOST MODERN DAY PROTESTORS ARE NOT ONLY SEVERAL CENTURIES BEHIND IN THEIR CALL TO PROTEST BUT ARE SO SELFISH THEY REALLY ARE NOT PREPARED TO DO ANYTHING OF REAL NECESSITY IF IT COMES WITH A SCARIFICE HOWEVER MINIMAL OR A LESSENING OF SELF COMFORT. FOR THE MODERN MASSES :IT IS JUST A COLDLY ACCEPTED HOBBY TO HYPOCRITICALLY AMUSE THEMSELVES BY.

  53. This is rubbish, we are deforesting the planet at an exponentially accelerating rate, so planting a few trees here and there does nothing, and who is going to pay the actual people to plant the trees?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *